Off-target offshore outsourcing
By
Jeff Kaplan
,
Network World
, 07/18/2005
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Few IT industry trends have been as controversial as offshore outsourcing . By not only offloading their IT functions to third parties, but also turning to remote low-cost outsourcers to gain the
greatest savings, corporations worldwide have accepted the notion that many aspects of IT are merely commodities despite the
business risks associated with outsourcing. While few firms are equipped to handle all of their IT functions on their own,
all companies should be cautious about a new round of opportunistic outsourcers trying to win a piece of the market with increasingly
offbeat business models.
One of the most bizarre is SeaCode, a venture that will place software engineers and application developers on a cruise ship
off the coast of California, where they supposedly will have a competitive advantage over more remote outsourcers in India,
China and elsewhere (see story ). Although this premise seems laughable, many corporations are so desperate to reduce expenses that the idea of using almost
any means to cut IT costs has become plausible-despite the fact that even the most conservative forms of IT outsourcing can
be fraught with problems.
For instance, the benchmarking firm Compass recently released a report saying hidden "self-support" costs that arise when
companies outsource desktop services can triple previous in-house support costs. This is because many outsourcers impose strict
policies that discourage end users from submitting desktop support requests and force them to try to fix their own problems.
There is no question that outsourcing is a good idea for many firms that need to reduce operating costs and improve IT operations.
However, many companies will be hurt by hastily following the herd down the outsourcing path without thoroughly evaluating
the growing array of new outsourcing providers. Given that various research reports contend more than half of traditional
outsourcing agreements to date have been terminated or substantially restructured because they failed to meet their original
business objectives, firms shouldn't plunge into new outsourcing arrangements without carefully examining the latest market
entrants.
As the labor costs of established offshore outsourcers in India and elsewhere escalate, many are searching for lower-cost
locations and trying to create less-expensive service delivery methods to remain competitive. Unfortunately, the new offshore
locations tend to be even more remote with fewer skilled workers.
Comment