Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Reactions to Brocade-Foundry deal

Industry watchers weigh in on what Brocade’s acquisition of Foundry means
Network Architecture Alert By Jeff Caruso , Network World , 07/24/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Site Editor Jeff Caruso helps you make sense of the evolving world of LANs and routers.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

As the impact of the news this week that Brocade Communications Systems will be acquiring Foundry Networks sank in, it drew a wide range of reactions - even just at Network World.

Cisco Subnet blogger Brad Reese keyed in on one observation – that in the conference call discussing the acquisition, Foundry CEO Bobby Johnson said that his role in the new company is still “undefined,” beyond just supporting Brocade CEO Mike Klayko. I don’t know if the uncertainty around Johnson’s role is having quite the negative impact that Reese is suggesting, but I agree that it would be to Brocade’s benefit to retain him if possible.

CCIE and blogger Michael Morris tried to figure out the motivation behind the move, and he settled on Fibre Channel over Ethernet, or FCoE. Morris says the acquisition creates a viable alternative to what Cisco is selling:

“So, this should be an interesting play. If I am going to update my [data center] LAN environment with FCoE I have to use Cisco's new - and, um, pricey - Nexus line anyway. That's a change in architecture, not a normal evolution of the 6500 or 4500 series. So, if the cost is low enough for Brocade/Foundry FCoE and I already have a Brocade SAN, do I make the jump to Brocade? Might be worth the look.”

Along the same lines, in Jon Brodkin’s story, Enterprise Strategy Group analyst Bob Laliberte says Foundry gives Brocade “instant credibility in the IP space.”

Another CCIE and blogger, Mark Lewis, figures that Brocade and Foundry both “have gazed into the future, not liked what they have seen, and jumped into each other's arms out of fright!”

Foundry, he says, fears new competition from Juniper Networks, while Brocade fears Cisco and its Nexus 7000. But Lewis couldn’t decide whether this was a good move for the companies’ survival or a bad one.

In Jim Duffy’s story, he notes that Cisco is unlikely to be affected greatly by the joining of these two companies, but the deal puts a lot of pressure on the rest of the vendors in the Ethernet switching market to keep up. If Cisco has Nexus, and Brocade and Foundry have their approach to data center networking, what do the other vendors have?

Many industry watchers, I think, see the acquisition as interesting, to say the least. It’s one of those announcements where you want to see where they take it from here.

Jeff Caruso is site editor at Network World.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (1)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Definetly can help FoundryBy Anonymous on July 27, 2008, 3:56 pmI work for a large telecom carrier and we had some issues with memory corruption on new foundry switches which they seem to have issues diagnosing at the lower level....

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed